|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
The Sixties RevolutionLet it be clearly understood that the only people on the face of the earth, in this generation or any other, who have tried to promote the "neutrality of music" are Christians living after 1965. What happened in the mid-sixties that was significant enough to cause many fundamental Christians to ignore what was then and is now common knowledge among musicians? I believe the roots are sociological rather than musical. Those of us who lived during that tumultuous time remember well the social climate. All that was traditional was suspect. The young rejected anything even vaguely associated with "the establishment." Perhaps the most traditional of all institutions was the church, and perhaps the most traditional of all aspects of the church was the music. The cry became "Give us something new!" Simultaneously in the secular world a new form of musical expression had captured the minds as well as the imaginations of this restless generation. This music they could feel! It gave voice to their rebellion and to their passion. Preachers fearlessly assailed the pivoting hips of Elvis and the moppy hair of the Beatles. The miniskirt was unclothing our girls, while every other standard was being pushed to the limit. Compared to rock-and-roll, church music seemed bland indeed. On the one hand, preachers were fighting rebellion--no long hair, no short skirts; on the other, they feared "turning off" this generation who had quite different tastes. It was against this backdrop that someone began to use rock-and-roll as a vehicle to reach this new generation. The reasoning was, "If we are going to reach them, we must speak their language." With the ever-widening media influence and so many in the church becoming entertainment oriented, the stage was set. "Get them to the church by giving them what they like; then give them what they need. Since a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down, let's coat the gospel with rock-and-roll." Someone described it in this way," We'll sneak up on them and inoculate them with the gospel before they know it." Flaws in Contemporary LogicAs viewed from twenty-five years down the road, this approach had several problems. The first is that the gospel is not medicine, but it is "the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth." It does not need covering up to make it more palatable or jazzing up to make it more relevant. It merely requires proclaiming so that God can do His work. Secondly, many preachers had already begun, and rightly so, to attack this music's sensuality, its driving jungle rhythm and the bizarre dress and behavior of its performers. But as the pressure mounted and apologists asked questions for which these preachers had no answers, many began to ignore the music and focus on the messages the songs gave. To be sure, preachers had plenty to preach about there. However, because most preachers did not feel qualified to talk about the music itself beyond the phrases "jungle beat" and "too loud," musicians interpreted their silence as tacit approval. With a little faulty logic about reaching the lost with its own music but with Biblical words, the corner was turned. If music is neutral, then why not use any style to communicate a good message? If the message of the text is all that matters, then any musical vehicle is appropriate. The Message of the MusicThe problem is that the message of the music is at least as powerful as that of the lyrics, and the perception of the message is greatly colored by the vehicle that carries it. So today every musical style imaginable from country to heavy-metal is being called sacred. How in the world did we move from traditional church music to Stryper in twenty short years? By accepting the totally fallacious position that music is neutral. But music is not neutral. Its message comes through loud and clear--often more clearly than the overshadowed words. It is time the twentieth-century church considered the message it is communicating by its music. Rather than a message of salt and light, and of separation and holiness, it has become a message of compromise and confusion. During the past twenty years, our young have taught us much about their music and free lifestyle; it is time we begin to teach them about godliness and holy living. Dan Sweatt is the pastor of Berean Baptist Church outside Atlanta. He is also a trained musician and popular conference speaker.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Site Sponsor:![]() |
About
Our Sponsors View All Of Our Sponsors |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
[ Join Our Mailing List
] [ Acknowledgements
] [ Our Site's Popular
Pages ] [ Spiritual
Help Available ] [ Contact
Us ] [ ] [ Recommended Sites ] [ Conference Information ] [ Doctrinal Statement ] [ Our Purpose ] [ Privacy Policy ] [ Our Webrings ] Most of the people writing and mentoring on this site are not licensed counselors or trained professionals. Rather, they are (saved) individuals using God's Word to help others. (If someone needs professional assistance we will attempt to match him/her with a professional counselor. Please note, professional counselors may charge fees for their services.) |
|||||
| New Hope Outreach
is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3), not-for-profit organization. All donations to
New Hope Outreach are tax deductible. This site is hosted and maintained by Complete Computer Solutions, Inc Copyright © 2001-2008 New Hope Outreach, Inc All Rights Reserved |
|||||
| Reproduction of content on this site, in any form, is strictly prohibited without written consent of the author(s) | |||||
|
This page has been displayed 29 times this month, 60 times since October 11, 2008 . |
|||||